United
States v. Maxwell, 42 M.J. 568 (A.F.C.C.A. 1995),
aff’d in part, rev’d in part, remanded,
45 M.J. 406 (C.A.A.F. 1996).
Private communications revealed as a result of a defendant’s
criminal activities do not violate defendant’s
1st and 5th Amendment rights. "The First Amendment
does not afford protection to indecent language under
the circumstances of this case."
§ 2-2 Self-Incrimination
Andresen
v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976).
Seizure of a defendant’s business records does
not violate the 5th Amendment because the defendant
was not compelled to testify against himself.